Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Fernando Romboli vs Marcelo Demoliner Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Romboli vs Demoliner analysis and find out who is favored!
Fernando Romboli vs Marcelo Demoliner Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Romboli 7 - 2 Demoliner
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Romboli has won 48.04% of points on their second serve, while Demoliner has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Romboli, in recent form, has won 36.84% of their opponent's second serve points, while Demoliner has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.53% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Romboli has saved 45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Demoliner has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Romboli has won 37.5% of matches played (W/L 3/ 5), with Demoliner winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Romboli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 321/ 232), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Demoliner has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 175/ 124), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Romboli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 3/ 5), where as Demoliner has played most of their matches on the Davis/Fed Cup, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 9 times before with Romboli winning 6 times and Demoliner being victorious 2 times. They have played 23 sets in total, with Romboli winning 14 and Demoliner winning 9. The last match between Romboli and Demoliner was at the Florianopolis Challenger, 27-02-2012, Q3, Clay with Fernando Romboli getting the victory 4-6 5-2 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:7:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Romboli and Demoliner have played a deciding set 4 times, with Romboli winning 3 times and Demoliner 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 4 tiebreaks against each other with Romboli winning 2, and Demoliner 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Romboli has played against opponents with an average rank of 349.13 while Demoliner has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Romboli has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Demoliner has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Romboli has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Demoliner has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
898
Rank
236
High
35
Age
R
Plays
7
Total2
0
Hard0
7
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
674
Rank
232
High
35
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
57% (374-287)
Career Total W/L
57% (233-175)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$23,910
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Fernando Romboli | Marcelo Demoliner |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 6 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 14 | 9 |
| Games Won | 111 | 101 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:7:40 | 0:7:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (27/44) | 57% (27/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 48% (13/27) | 89% (24/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (9/17) | 45% (9/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 57% (4/7) |
| Return Points W% | 30% (14/47) | 50% (22/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 33% (6/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 50% (6/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (6/3) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 5-2 ret. | |||||
| 6-7(8) 7-5 3-1 ret. | |||||
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Marcelo Demoliner
Player
Fernando Romboli
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(3) 1-0 ret. | |||||
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
| 6-7(2) 6-2 6-3 | |||||
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
| 6-2 6-7(4) 6-4 | |||||
| 6-4 4-6 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Fernando Romboli | Marcelo Demoliner |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 41% (34/48) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 16 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 15 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:36 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 395.25 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (143/245) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (101/143) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (49/102) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 28% (64/229) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Fernando Romboli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Fernando Romboli
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fernando Romboli
Player
Juan Bautista Otegui
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
67 of
97)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
32 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Fernando Romboli
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
8
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
20%
(
15 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Fernando Romboli
62%
(
8 of
13)
1st Serve %
38%
(
3 of
8)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
14
Total Points Won
7
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mateus Alves
Player
Fernando Romboli
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
14
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
6
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
27 of
32)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
7 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fernando Romboli
Player
Mateus Alves
60%
(
78 of
129)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
111)
24
Aces
27
5
Double Faults
5
86%
(
67 of
78)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
64 of
73)
49%
(
25 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
37 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
23 of
111)
115
Total Points Won
125
|
7-6(7) 6-7(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fernando Romboli
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
14
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
Player
Fernando Romboli
22%
(
2 of
9)
1st Serve %
60%
(
3 of
5)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
9
Total Points Won
5
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Fernando Romboli
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Marcelo Demoliner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Marcelo Demoliner
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
99)
6
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 6-7(6) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cameron Norrie
Player
Marcelo Demoliner
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Vasilenko
Player
Marcelo Demoliner
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
1
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marcelo Demoliner
Player
Temur Ismailov
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
14
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
42 of
52)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
22 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcelo Demoliner
Player
Kristian Lozan
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
Marcelo Demoliner
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Marcelo Demoliner
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
57
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marcelo Demoliner
Player
Miki Jankovic
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
31 of
41)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcelo Demoliner
Player
Matej Vocel
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marcelo Demoliner
Player
Lucas Gomez
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Romboli Vs Demoliner Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
